Get through the stack. Keep the final say.

TenByte turns assignment files and a class set of student work into consistent grading proposals without taking the teacher out of the decision.

Students never need a TenByte account.

Literary analysis essay
AP English Language · Period 4
Ready to grade

Teacher materials

Rubric, prompt, readings, and notes

6 files

Grading plan

Approved and frozen for this class set

Student submissions

One isolated grading run per student

30

30 grades ready

Waiting for teacher review

Review queue
01

Teacher-controlled from start to finish

02

Private, assignment-scoped access

03

Clean, unbranded student feedback

The workflow

Give TenByte the messy pile. Get back a reviewable process.

Teachers should not have to rebuild every assignment inside another piece of software. The source files already contain the truth; TenByte does the organizational work around them.

01

Drop in the source material

Upload the rubric, prompt, answer key, readings, and teacher notes together. TenByte sorts out what each file is for.

02

Approve one grading plan

TenByte turns the assignment into a clear grading standard. You review it once before any student work is evaluated.

03

Review, approve, and return

Each submission gets its own grading run. Edit anything, approve the final result, then export clean feedback for the student.

Built around trust

Useful AI. Clear boundaries.

Same standard, every time

The approved grading plan is frozen for the class, so the rules do not quietly drift halfway through the stack.

Every student stays separate

One submission, one isolated grading context. A student is never judged against another student's work.

Nothing final without you

AI output remains a proposal until a teacher reviews and approves it. The judgment stays human.

Ready when you are

Spend less time getting to the grade you stand behind.

Start grading